That's the only question worth asking about a trading tool, and almost nobody answers it honestly. Quantoreum tests indicators, strategies and AI tools against public data, then publishes both the answer and the working.
Scored on the September 2026 data refresh. Each links to the full breakdown and the sources behind it.
Heavily adopted, actively maintained, and fully open source — you can read exactly what it does before using it.
Genuinely maintained and widely used, but invite-only, so the logic can't be checked before you pay.
A devoted following, but the published version hasn't been touched since January 2023 and remains closed.
Three categories, scored by the same method, so a free community script and a $400 suite can be compared on the same terms.
Scripts rated on adoption, update history, source transparency and the capabilities they actually expose.
100 testedPublicly documented strategies run on historical data, with the backtest code published next to the result.
In development
Pine Script generators and AI assistants, separated by what they genuinely do rather than category labels.
In development
Every score on this site is produced by the same weighted formula from public data. Nothing is nudged by hand, and no vendor can pay to move.
How many traders actually use it, read from the public listing and log-scaled so the biggest names don't swamp the rest.
Time since the author last shipped an update. Abandoned is abandoned, however good it once was.
Whether you can read the logic before paying. Open source scores highest, invite-only lowest.
Alerts and multi-timeframe support, confirmed by loading the tool rather than by reading its sales page.